Erik Tollerud

> The 2nd and 3rd is already possible with the current structure. And repo creation is likely be configured sufficiently, too. Can you clarify what you mean by "current structure"...

And to be clear: I am comfortable giving the all-repo powers, since it's the sort of thing we already have given roles similar power (although admittedly, all before the finer-grained...

@ceb8 - depends on how much money, I suppose! But it's quite literally paying money to lower administrative overhaed, which is something I am generally in favor of (as, in...

Oh, but *I* am in favor of just giving the team the regular powers to do this, which we can do without paying, just we have to depend on trust...

Right, ok, sounds like we are saying the exact same thing there on the current status. Good point though (also @Cadair ), that another way around the custom roles is...

@mhvk - do you think you'll be able to work on this at all today? It would be good to try to get this in for feature freeze if we...

I updated this but its been more complex than I thought, because for reasons I do not understand, DE440 is giving notably different answers at the ~few arcmin level, which...

I'm pretty sure this won't be making 5.1, but I'm going to write a quick PR that just adds a bit of documentation information about de440s so that people who...

Revisiting this for 5.2 - @mhvk, I doubt we will have time to get this by tonight, so I pushed it to 5.3, but do you think we should abandon...

Actually one clarification: what I described does *not* work in `sidecar` mode even if I run them in spearate cells. It *does* work in "inline" mode though!