Erik Tollerud

I'm in favor of this idea broadly. To give a bit more context of the cost for CI, prompted by a suggestion from @saimn, here is a back-of-the-envelop estimate: *...

Also (somewhat ironically while I was on an airplane...), I thought a bit more about the CI and @saimn's comments - I think I probably low-balled by maybe a factor...

CI also has the element that it's a lot easier to truly offset it via renewable energy, since I'm pretty sure a large fraction of the carbon is just from...

I like @astrofrog's idea here! And prompted by this and the #16 discussion, the interim finance committee has approved ~$50/yr for this purpose.

:+1: to the idea. I wonder if maybe this belongs in `CONTRIBUTING.md`, though? (or perhaps _both_ places?)

In some out-of-band discussion we opted to go the archive route. So I am archiving this repo as it stands. If anyone wants to consider bringing it back feel free...

FYI, this is what the contributor guideline link looks like in a github PR: 

There's was a Tuesday session at the CoCo mtg on policies, recorded in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pO0giLKGEle5rJeyxhc33rIARY_e_naLiYprScROP84/edit#bookmark=id.xylqf1iojjau

Hmm I mildly disagree that treating it as "the one slit case" makes sense. I think a lot of awkwardness in Python's past and pypeit itself stem from an unwillingness...

Out-of-band it was pointed ouit this is missing a sky-subtraction step. I had mentally lumped this in with the extraction step, but it should be a *separate* step given that...