cnvkit
cnvkit copied to clipboard
CNVkit failed on CNVs simulation
--Hi,
i have simulated 10 CNVs from 100bp to 300 bp (5 gains and 5 losses) on chr20 with SimulateCNVs.py tool , below positions of the simulated CNVs:
chr20 31282724 31283023 6 chr20 31351055 31351355 5 chr20 31474153 31474453 0 chr20 31481038 31481337 0 chr20 31495624 31495923 8 chr20 31634656 31634955 0 chr20 31697777 31698077 0 chr20 31700985 31701284 6 chr20 31827963 31828263 4 chr20 32050705 32051004 0
then i have generated paired-end reads (2x150bp) in 210x coverage in the regions of CNV and paired-end reads in 200x outside those regions.
i have running CNVkit with: cnvkit.py batch -n -m wgs chr20.bam -f chr20.fa --annotate refFlat_chr20.txt --short-names cnvkit.py genemetrics chr20.cnr -s chr20.cns
Found 0 gene-level gains and losses gene chromosome start end log2
this is my chr20.bintest.cns file:
chromosome start end gene depth log2 weight p_bintest chr20 60000 65000 - 158.99 -0.316818 0.999338 1.28929e-31 chr20 26361230 26366231 - 139.144 -0.507923 0.999338 3.42855e-83 chr20 26381231 26386232 - 159.837 -0.306426 0.999338 1.56106e-29 chr20 26585886 26590875 - 174.421 -0.179178 0.999337 1.92179e-09 chr20 26606352 26611347 - 178.459 -0.147409 0.999337 4.53711e-06 chr20 26631326 26636320 - 182.47 -0.115974 0.999337 0.00193231 chr20 26646310 26651305 - 180.045 -0.133396 0.999337 8.5251e-05 chr20 27500410 27505405 - 182.635 -0.112833 0.999337 0.00318698 chr20 28314552 28319547 - 177.472 -0.155089 0.999337 8.04813e-07 chr20 28494363 28499358 - 180.887 -0.128384 0.999337 0.000224182 chr20 28504764 28509743 - 174.089 -0.181911 0.999336 9.64971e-10 chr20 28554563 28559543 - 180.261 -0.134181 0.999336 7.62161e-05 chr20 28644202 28649182 - 163.873 -0.27086 0.999336 8.72903e-23 chr20 28649182 28654162 - 161.759 -0.290676 0.999336 2.05167e-26 chr20 28654162 28659142 - 175.794 -0.170542 0.999336 1.84409e-08 chr20 28694002 28698982 - 165.82 -0.254497 0.999336 5.52008e-20 chr20 28748781 28753761 - 123.535 -0.679575 0.999336 1.06972e-149 chr20 28753761 28758741 - 169.214 -0.225262 0.999336 1.92923e-15 chr20 28788621 28793601 - 175.136 -0.174813 0.999336 6.17478e-09 chr20 28859997 28865053 - 181.514 -0.123431 0.999341 0.000497102 chr20 28865053 28870109 - 150.666 -0.392615 0.999341 1.46701e-49 chr20 28885278 28890335 - 174.201 -0.18274 0.999341 6.5633e-10 chr20 29126762 29131771 - 181.153 -0.126265 0.999338 0.000317952 chr20 29136780 29141788 - 178.864 -0.144779 0.999338 7.79833e-06 chr20 29161823 29166832 - 181.838 -0.121612 0.999338 0.000676996 chr20 29201893 29206902 - 180.434 -0.132953 0.999338 8.89989e-05 chr20 29267006 29272015 - 176.17 -0.167313 0.999338 3.85767e-08 chr20 29312084 29317093 - 166.278 -0.251911 0.999338 1.19962e-19 chr20 29412259 29417267 FRG2EP 144.98 -0.44836 0.999338 1.31414e-64 chr20 29447320 29452328 LOC105379477 173.933 -0.188419 0.999338 1.71489e-10 chr20 29537476 29542485 - 167.76 -0.23602 0.999338 4.15398e-17 chr20 29562520 29567529 - 123.564 -0.681872 0.999338 5.4715e-151 chr20 29692746 29697755 - 178.269 -0.150253 0.999338 2.37778e-06 chr20 29883077 29888086 - 182.645 -0.114627 0.999338 0.00237659 chr20 30013304 30018313 - 181.09 -0.12682 0.999338 0.000292682 chr20 30098401 30103427 - 180.22 -0.133897 0.999339 7.62161e-05 chr20 30108454 30113480 - 173.633 -0.187249 0.999339 2.17013e-10 chr20 30128560 30133587 - 181.674 -0.122291 0.999339 0.000610383 chr20 31157036 31162036 - 82.933 -1.25417 0.999338 0 chr20 31282044 31287044 - 226.553 0.12206 0.999338 0.000642867 chr20 31347048 31352048 - 237.001 0.18467 0.999338 4.62262e-10 chr20 31477056 31482056 REM1 191.153 -0.12532 0.999338 0.00037722 chr20 31492057 31497057 - 279.577 0.423387 0.999338 1.79097e-57 chr20 31697070 31702071 BCL2L1 238.945 0.196927 0.999338 1.49307e-11 chr20 31827079 31832079 MYLK2 225.786 0.114074 0.999338 0.00259311 chr20 32047093 32052093 - 191.429 -0.12269 0.999338 0.000598033 chr20 36312367 36317367 DLGAP4 172.563 -0.199798 0.999338 6.64118e-12
why i can't find the CNVs i have simulated ?
Thank you for your help --
Hi @lmanchon,
Several things:
-
bintest.cns
is probably not the most relevant ".cns" file to use at 1st glance (as some filters are applied). To start simple, look at yourchr20.cns
instead - Could be helpful that you
scatter
plot yourchr20.c{r,s}
files, trying to restrein at the range of your expected CNV => And also you canheatmap
yourchr20.cnr
- From CNVkit documentation,
genemetrics
has default values:--min-probes 3 --threshold 0.2
=> In particular, in your context of searching exon-level CNV, setting--min-probes 0
could be more appropriate (try also--threshold 0
to not miss anything) - Are you certain you used SimulateCNVs.py in WGS mode? To match usage you showed:
cnvkit.py batch -m wgs
=> Because 200X coverage for a whole-genome looks a lot to me, but maybe I am wrong => CNVkit process data differently between-m wgs
and (default)-m hybrid
methods, so you have to use the one that best match your simulated data
Hope this helps. Have a nice day. Felix.
--Hi,
i have simulated target-sequencing with paired-reads on targets (chr20.bed) with some CNVs, then when i run cnvkit with: cnvkit.py batch simulated.bam -n -m hybrid -f chr20.fa -t chr20.bed --annotate refFlat_chr20.txt --short-names, it failed:
WARNING: Most antitarget bins (100.00%, 1288/1288) have low or no coverage; is this amplicon/WGS?
Antitargets are nan x more variable than targets
Wrote ./simulated.cnr with 2879 regions
Segmenting ./simulated.cnr ...
Segmenting with method 'cbs', significance threshold 0.0001, in 1 processes
Smoothing overshot at 25 / 1246 indices: (-3.038408817379588, 12.358586746326198) vs. original (-0.026595700391474963, 28.615235511834953)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/local/bin/cnvkit.py", line 9, in
i have simulated the paired-end reads in 300x and the CNVs paired-end reads in 330x to then try to detect them.
with -m amplicon it run fine but it's not the appropriate parameter for this design.
what's wrong ?