cnvkit icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cnvkit copied to clipboard

Clarify Germline Analysis Pipeline in User Guide

Open DarioS opened this issue 5 years ago • 5 comments

I am interested in calculating copy number values for each sample in set of normal (blood) samples. I read the Germline Analysis section, which recommended the call command. But, the call module requires CNS files. Could the Germline Analysis section contain an example similar to the example showing the batch command for tumour-normal analysis in the pipeline section? It'd be convenient to use batch for germline analysis also, although I'm unsure if it's possible.

DarioS avatar Feb 14 '19 01:02 DarioS

Sure, I can add that. The batch example is essentially the same either way -- you provide case and control BAM files, and the pipeline constructs a pooled reference from the control BAMs, normalizes each case BAM to that reference, and performs segmentation on the normalized, binned coverage depth log-ratios. The output of segmentation is a .cns file for each case BAM file, and the batch command will produce these.

etal avatar Feb 17 '19 06:02 etal

You seem to describe copy number calculation of the cancer samples, but I was searching for an example of germline copy number analysis (i.e. absolute copy number estimates for each of the normal samples of a tumour-normal sample set, assuming that most regions of the genome have two copies/chromosomes).

DarioS avatar Feb 18 '19 06:02 DarioS

Does this mean CNVkit cannot call CNVs without a "control" panel? What if I want to make germline calls on a 30X whole genome for one sample at a time?

dantaki avatar Oct 08 '19 19:10 dantaki

Bumping this question: can I use batch on the normal, unpaired, WGS samples if I create a flat reference?

FriederikeHanssen avatar Aug 09 '23 10:08 FriederikeHanssen

Yes, you can, but I'd recommend interpreting the results cautiously. The results on WGS without a robust reference built from a pool of control samples tend to be too noisy to reliably call most germline alterations, which are usually small, but it could maybe catch a larger-scale alteration if you have reason to believe that could be present in your sample (e.g. tumor cells). For more reliable results overall I'd recommend a method specifically designed for WGS like Parliament2 or Manta.

etal avatar Aug 11 '23 03:08 etal