eskerda

Hello @eUgEntOptIc44 , thanks for the patch. So the reason for not using the regular GBFS parser is that the systems are not logically grouped then? I see there are...

Are the general endpoints working for you? I am getting empty responses I am very thankful for this contribution, but at the same time I am very wary of adding...

closed in favor of https://github.com/eskerda/pybikes/pull/717

that's what the canonical source is reporting. System seems offline atm. https://putian.ptyoubike.com/station/map we could clamp the numbers to 0. Not sure what to make out of it or if the...

The purpose of `has_ebikes` is a bit confusing, but it's meant to indicate if the station supports/supplies electrical bikes. I guess it's a bit redundant, and could be inferred by...

System will discontinue by the end of Sept. 2025 and a new one will be implemented according to this https://muenchenunterwegs.de/angebote/mvg-rad

[TIL `return_constraint`](https://github.com/MobilityData/gbfs/blob/v2.3/gbfs.md#vehicle_typesjson). Let me look into this and see a way to include it without leaking too much in our data model

The original feed from deutschebahn does not include it either ``` (Pdb) from pprint import pprint (Pdb) pprint(vehicle_info) {'data': {'vehicle_types': [{'form_factor': 'bicycle', 'name': 'bike', 'propulsion_type': 'human', 'vehicle_type_id': '5e7fd67c-d83b-3273-84b1-a1597eb84eb7'}, {'form_factor': 'bicycle',...

> For RegioRad Stuttgart I can confirm that it is any_station for both vehicle_types. @1Maxnet1 checking the GBFS docs on `any_station` it seems to imply that vehicles can only be...

My bad, I got both feeds mixed up. Same thing happens for RegioRadStuttgart though See https://citybik.es/map/stadtrad-stuttgart (blue dots)