Radek Szymczyszyn

Some more info: ``` 20:11:05 erszcz @ x6 : ~/work/erszcz/non-otp-libraries (gradualizer %) $ tokei =============================================================================== Language Files Lines Code Comments Blanks =============================================================================== AsciiDoc 4 428 295 0 133 BASH 2...

I just ran `rebar3 gradualizer` without looking under the hood this time. I think it runs on the beams, but maybe it needs an extra flag. Good point to check,...

Hi, @xxdavid! > Maybe I'm wrong but I think we have to stick to rank-1 polymorphism as we don't even have syntax for higher-rank polymorphism [...] Good thinking. We're generally...

Hi, @japhib! > [...] it would be very helpful if Gradualizer could provide the type that it infers for any particular variable. > For now it would be quite useful...

@japhib what do you think of #529 as a partial solution? It's the low hanging fruit achievable without revolutionary refactorings, which should aid in the case when knowing a variable...

I think the README should be updated to reflect the current CI. IMO maintenance effort this many versions backwards will be a problem and we've not even caught up with...

Hi, @chiroptical! Firstly, sorry for a long lack of response. I'm volunteering on this project and sometimes I just don't have as much time to spend on it as I'd...

Related to #530 and #536

Related to #530.

Hmm, now that I look at the results again, they don't look THAT bad: > Failed: 20. Skipped: 0. Passed: 708. Maybe it's not such a bad idea after all......