Erik Wrede

Is this still relevant? Using the `ClientIDMutation` from graphene should do the job now.

Was able to reproduce this issue in a similar case using FastAPI and graphene-starlette3. Seems to be non-breaking with regards to query resolution though. Has anyone found any fix to...

TODO: re-check with #169 merged, might be a suppressed underlying SQLAlchemy exception.

The idea of implementing async sessions is great. @jendrikjoe How would your MVP work with batch loading or relationships in general? I'll look into this next week and follow up...

We should clearly communicate the lack of support for certain lazy loading techniques then. Additionally, I think a PR would require a more elegant solution than overriding the get_node classmethod...

Hey, I've looked into it again. If you want you can open a merge request with a proof of concept and we can start with that. This should change as...

There is an issue tracking this in graphene: https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene/issues/968 Additionally, you could try his for a fix: https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene-sqlalchemy/pull/261

Sounds helpful! However, I don't think a `Meta` entry would be the right place for this since some models might require different time formats in the same response. The approach...

@kurtwiersma if you're still up for that, feel free to go ahead. It's probably best to create a new branch for the old release. Would appreciate the effort!

This looks like an issue with graphql-server[flask] or graphene rather than this library. Maybe the event loop introduced with graphene3 is destroyed during live-reload? Have you found any fix so...