Erik Erlandson

Simplifying coulomb operation signatures

15

When I designed the scala-3 port, I designed the operation signatures to support value semantics similar to traditional numeric value promotion: for example `1 + 2.0 => 3.0` (integer +...

constant-factor syntax support depends on scala 3.4 (?)

1

Syntax support for constant factor multiplication or division, aka `2 * q` or `q / 2`, etc, using the new scala 3 `extension` feature, currently is not feasible. SIP-54 will...

One example of a reproducer: ```scala scala> import coulomb.*, coulomb.syntax.*, coulomb.conversion.*, coulomb.units.si.{*, given}, coulomb.units.si.prefixes.{*, given}, algebra.instances.all.given, coulomb.ops.algebra.all.given, coulomb.policy.standard.given, scala.language.implicitConversions // works as expected scala> summon[coulomb.ops.SimplifiedUnit[Meter ^ 2]] val res0: coulomb.ops.SimplifiedUnit.NC[coulomb.units.si.Meter...

Coulomb collections

1

An attempt to implement #50

integration for ciris: https://cir.is/

`mdoc:nest` seems close to "push a new nested scoping", but there does not seem to be a concept of "pop one scope up" - `mdoc:reset` basically pops all existing scope...

(I really wanted to send you an email, but couldn't find your address, so I settled for filing a fake issue) I saw you had also done work with compile-time...

it's the old BASIC line numbering problem. should we do - 10-xxx - 20-xxx in case we want to add stages?

on the 'deliver container image' issue form, notify and publish build link to issue

9

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.** When submitting an issue to deliver a new container image build tag, for example: https://github.com/thoth-station/ray-operator/issues/5 It would be useful for...

inline algebra typeclass methods

19

fix #1309