multi-core-python

multi-core-python copied to clipboard

Learn lessons from the PyParallel project

11

I believe our sub-interpreters work in PEP 554 can be greatly enhanced with the ideas of the [PyParallel ](https://github.com/pyparallel/pyparallel) project. Since we're no longer going to share the GIL between...

thedrow

Interpreter.run() should also accept a function, a method or a code object

1

Right now, forcing the user to write explicit code when calling `run()` isn't convenient. We could accept a code object instead or fetch it from a callable using inspect.

thedrow

Identify any other issues found via mod_wsgi.

4

(also other subinterpreters users, e.g. Ceph) (also feedback from Graham)

ericsnowcurrently

Erlang/Elixir/BEAM

1

I am sure you are aware but this approach sounds very similar to the way the BEAM languages work. Lightweight "processes" managed by the BEAM VM that don't share any...

idahogray

Can't unpickle objects defined in __main__

9

(https://bugs.python.org/issue37292) ORIGINAL POST: ------------------ As of CPython 3.8.0b1, main branch (please let me know if there's a different branch I should use): If one pickles an object that is defined...

crusaderky

PEP 554 (text) updates

3

A few things have changed since the last time the PEP was updated: - [ ] ... - [ ] ... - [ ] ...

ericsnowcurrently

A guide for PEP384 and static free C Extensions

3

One of the big blockers for PEP554 and different Python VM implementations is the use of module state in static globals. Getting rid of this would mean the full migration...

eduardo-elizondo

intermittent test failures

3

https://bugs.python.org/issue37224 ~https://bugs.python.org/issue33868~ ~https://bugs.python.org/issue33356~

ericsnowcurrently

Get Cython to produce subinterpreter-compatible extensions.

3

At the Python core sprint this year I asked @scoder about Cython support for subinterpreters. He explained that Cython implements PEP 489 (multi-phase init) but does not support subinterpreters (even...

ericsnowcurrently

Question: Channels will never support queue-like polling interface?

1

Currently PEP 554 [states](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0554/#id72 ), that the idea of channels acting like queues was rejected. I'm a bit surprised about that as single-producer-single-consumer queues (e.g. a ring buffer) are basically...

dumblob