Eric Niebler

> The code has UB, as a comparison of any_view does not match the comparison of the algorithms I took a shortcut. Of course a full solution would completely flesh...

@CaseyCarter wrote: > An implementation is in no way required to implement them as function objects... Your code may or may not work as written in C++20. Bah, humbug! Being...

@tomaszkam One other suggestion for your paper: rather that simply dropping the `CommonReference` syntactic requirements, you could make it a purely semantic requirement instead. Appeal to the existence of a...

Why is it called `post_increment()` instead of `next(int)`? And I don't yet understand why it's needed at all. For the output iterators I've seen one or both of `next` and...

This is feeling a bit like trying to make a dollar out of fifteen cents. An overly complex `basic_iterator` doesn't make the job of implementing an iterator simpler. I've said...

Not yet. Want to start the discussion?

run tests

run tests

@allisonvacanti I see you tagged this with "2.0" milestone, but this is a change that is safe to make in the 1.X series, IMO.

run tests