Eric Agol

Interesting - perhaps any \mu^\alpha works with \mu positive or negative. One nice thing about the model in Schlawin et al. is that it does have a physical motivation: if...

I don't think @rodluger is looking at this, and I have not yet, so I would like if you want to work on this.

@ianw89 Yes, and I have an example notebook of how to call this in the `notebooks/` directory.

@ianw89 That sounds great. Yes, I think varying the number of data points is a good way to compare. Sometimes if there are few points in the light curve, the...

We've described this in the paper, but leave it for future work.

This looks great! @dfm told me that exoplanet currently uses a constant number of sub-exposure time points for the integration, so we are currently comparing apples with oranges. He also...

@dfm I wanted to check that the Limbdark.jl adaptive integrator wasn't behaving too inefficiently (I don't care about the speed of the actual light curve component, just the integrator, and...

I agree - the test I was hoping to carry out for efficiency of the time-integration will not be straightforward in using exoplanet. I would be interested in a performance...

That's neat! The Kepler solver in NbodyGradient takes a different form that a typical Kepler solver - it's a universal solver, and it uses the difference in M and s...

That sounds useful!