David Lamparter
David Lamparter
@skydig it's work in progress in https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/9293 - it should work but I need to get back to it, clean it up, and add testcases
⇒ correct behavior if we get MLD join for `ff05::2` — if it changes, need logs + pcap (should always be there)
Any chance for this to use the XFRM infrastructure, i.e. `setsockopt(..., IP_XFRM_POLICY, ...)` rather than yet another new sockopt? (and `socket(AF_NETLINK, ..., NETLINK_XFRM)` for key management?)
> This ABI mirrors TCP_MD5SIG because the standard is very directly intended to replace TCP-MD5. TCP sockopts are very easy to use and not at all scarce so why not...
> a preview of what @qlyoung my attempt at replacing topotests with something that is less horrible. Namely, a potato. Jokes aside, it's a new (blank-slate) test framework for FRR....
@qlyoung this has no interactions with micronet, there is no shared code between this and topotests. Feature-wise, this is a superset of micronet (it uses the same container setup, plus...
(I'm aware this needs to be rebased. It's a **DRAFT**. I pushed it out for visibility and to avoid duplicate work. Due to priorities/resource allocations, this is probably going to...
This is, sadly, duplicate with some pending work I also have… … and the reason I haven't opened it as PR yet is that we still don't have a proper...
Quick look: ``` 2021/11/14 10:33:58.096 ZEBRA: default(0:254):207.237.112.0/21: Processing rn 0x55d860b53020 2021/11/14 10:33:58.096 ZEBRA: default(0:254):207.237.112.0/21: Examine re 0x55d860b52c70 (connected) status 11 flags 8 dist 0 metric 0 2021/11/14 10:33:58.096 ZEBRA: default(0:254):207.237.112.0/21:...