equinor
Fix get_number_of_existing_runpaths()
Issue Resolves #8276
Approach Short description of the approach
(Screenshot of new behavior in GUI if applicable)
- [ ] PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
- [ ] Added appropriate release note label
- [ ] Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
- [ ] Make sure tests pass locally (after every commit!)
When applicable
- [ ] When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
- [ ] New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
- [ ] Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
- [ ] Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
- [ ] Bug fix: Create Backport PR to latest release
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 86.92%. Comparing base (
6be9385) to head (d710c60).
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8297 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 86.92% 86.92% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 375 375
Lines 23523 23524 +1
Branches 624 626 +2
==========================================
Hits 20448 20448
+ Misses 2999 2997 -2
- Partials 76 79 +3
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I'm now getting: 100 out of 100 realizations are running in existing runpaths.
This look alright I think.
However, the Experiment name input is "red" indicating a duplicate experiment name, which I don't think makes sense since we are re-running in an existing experiment.
Another issue perhaps?
Experiment nameinput is "red" indicating a duplicate experiment name, which I don't think makes sense since we are re-running in an existing experiment. Another issue perhaps?
This is another issue. I will create one