conditional fields of constexpr literal structs

Open youknowone opened this issue 1 year ago • 5 comments

Partially fix #955 about constexpr

#988 is included in this PR

Because constexpr and defines require very different approach about this problem, I created another PR for constexpr fix while keeping the other one for define fix.

Aug 10 '24 15:08 youknowone

Sorry for the lag getting to this btw :(

Oct 27 '24 23:10 emilio

@emilio Thank you for the review! I updated the both PRs

Oct 28 '24 06:10 youknowone

Could you rebase this please? Thanks!

Oct 28 '24 15:10 emilio

rebased

Oct 29 '24 07:10 youknowone

@emilio Could you check it again?

Nov 01 '24 09:11 youknowone

I updated my local patch to this branch. It worked well for the project.

Nov 05 '24 07:11 youknowone

@emilio is there any blocker?

Jan 02 '25 08:01 youknowone

@emilio reminding

Mar 06 '25 08:03 youknowone

rebased

Mar 26 '25 02:03 youknowone

@emilio reminding when you come back

May 20 '25 11:05 youknowone

Thaks for the ping!

May 20 '25 11:05 emilio