epinault

I don t think there are as many concerns. the original concerns is that having a gen server in front of an ETS table creates a singleton (therefore performance botttleneck)....

yea not sure what the actual plan is for this one but seems like introducing a reset API for all backend would do. PR welcome or else I ll see...

@jared-mackey seems like an interesting idea. what backend are currently supported with Nebulex?

@florius0 see https://github.com/ExHammer/hammer/pull/72 . Seems. @ruslandoga was looking at that but not sure if he made any progress on cutting his MR smaller

@taj @btkostner @mattpolzin @maartenvanvliet I see a lot of issue that seem unattended. is this package maintained? what the process as I see many stale MR that are old and...

if I post an MR would you be able to merge and release a new version of the package?

so who has permissions? who can help with this ? I appreciate your reply by the way and totally understand the OSS maintenance burden :)

any progress on this?

any chance we can merge this?

I ll open a PR then! and link it here! thanks!