[bp/1.28] Bump rules-go to 0.41.0

[jwendell]

This version contains the fix for using local sdk with go >= 1.21

https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_go/pull/3600

[repokitteh-read-only[bot]]

CC @envoyproxy/dependency-shepherds: Your approval is needed for changes made to (bazel/.*repos.*\.bzl)|(bazel/dependency_imports\.bzl)|(api/bazel/.*\.bzl)|(.*/requirements\.txt)|(.*\.patch). envoyproxy/dependency-shepherds assignee is @moderation

:cat:

Caused by: https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/34941 was opened by jwendell.

see: more, trace.

[jwendell]

/retest

[phlax]

ci failures look ~real

Repository rule http_archive defined at:
  /build/bazel_root/base/external/bazel_tools/tools/build_defs/repo/http.bzl:372:31: in <toplevel>
ERROR: /build/bazel_root/base/external/com_github_cncf_xds_go/xds/type/v3/BUILD.bazel:3:11: no such package '@go_googleapis//google/api/expr/v1alpha1': The repository '@go_googleapis' could not be resolved: Repository '@go_googleapis' is not defined and referenced by '@com_github_cncf_xds_go//xds/type/v3:type'
ERROR: Analysis of target '//contrib/golang/router/cluster_specifier/test/test_data/simple:plugin.so' failed; build aborted: 
INFO: Elapsed time: 49.836s
INFO: 0 processes.

this has come up before @mmorel-35 might know why this happens

[jwendell]

that's weird, we already applied that change to our fork and it's building fine...

[mmorel-35]

Please have a look over here https://github.com/envoyproxy/envoy/pull/33084/files

[moderation]

Current main branch rules_go is at 0.46.0 - should we bump to that version?

[phlax]

Current main branch rules_go is at 0.46.0 - should we bump to that version?

i think lets land these (once ci issues are resolved)

we can bump main further and backport more if required

[phlax]

hmm - actually @jwendell i just realized that this isnt actually a backport - i think @moderation is right - that we should just pick the actual backport - same with PRs on other branches

[jwendell]

Yeah, you're right, this is not a backport. I was just trying to be moderate and bump the versions only to the minimal version required, but if bringing it in pair with main is not an issue, I'll do it.

Thanks for the review folks.