Mathieu
Mathieu
Hi @cptartur sure, let me know. Perhaps you could use the `#[deprecated()]` attributes and keep old items at the same time.
opened #2421 for non breaking changes.
@ScottyDavies please stop spamming all repositories
probably simpler to replace "for things" by "for items"
closing to keep the same formulation as rustfmt
> will this specific contract allow this? since its solidity im not sure it can be called with starknet SDK yet Starknet SDK crafts the calldata and then your frontend...
@ClementWalter the Language Server has some issues with procedural macros (they're undetected so considered as errors) - as such I don't want to merge it yet, I reported the issue...
@Eikix what's the concrete use case as of now? If not, this is going to be stale for a while until there is demand for it.
I don't understand the problem. Can't you use the macro?
merge blocked until snfoundry allows use of scarb macros