engageub

Hi, Thank you for the response. Yes, `OPENVPN_VERSION=2.5` reduces the CPU similar to v3.37.0. However, there is a problem with consistency in the latest version. When I run the command...

> Do you also have the problem with v3.38.0? v3.38.0 is slightly better than v3.37.0 when compared to memory usage. v3.38.0 was consuming about 56 MB where as v3.37.0 was...

In v3.37.0, I also observed that the default health checks were consuming more CPU. A 5-second interval ping is too aggressive for health checks. By disabling health checks and removing...

Thank you for your response. I have downloaded the Dockerfile, removed the health checks and exposed ports, and subsequently rebuilt the Docker image. From my observations, the primary contributor to...

Thank you for the response. I used version v3.39.0 without health checks and it consumes about 160% CPU. This is more than 80 times the previous versions.  Thank you

Hi, The CPU utilization figures provided for version 3.39.0 are reported **without** bandwidth stress. I have not used openVPN 2.5 on 3.39.0. At the moment, play with docker has diskspace...

I would like to provide an update regarding my previous comment. I have successfully downgraded the OpenVPN version from 2.6.11 to 2.5 on version 3.39.0, and observed that the CPU...

Thank you for the response. > Why not use v3.39 with `OPENVPN_VERSION=2.5` though? There are quite a few fixes and features, added see the [release notes](https://github.com/qdm12/gluetun/releases). > > > Yes,...

Thank you for the response. Unfortunately I don't have project file as mentioned. I only have the model file downloaded in zip format.

Hi, To use multiproxy with multi account, you may have a look at this. https://github.com/engageub/InternetIncome Thank you