Not all terms have descriptions

[egonw]

whereas our DoW insists on that they all have. This is what BioPortal reports vor 3.0:

CLASSES WITH NO DEFINITION: 3226

Note that a good part of this are the terms from the NPO for which we yet need to develop a tool to extract the description from the XMLLiteral.

[JKChang2015]

I counted the total number of defined terms with either of following annotation properties: ("definition" in different external ontologies)

http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#def http://purl.bioontology.org/ontology/npo#definition http://scai.fraunhofer.de/HuPSON#SCAIVPH_00000009 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo/definition http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115 http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBPROP_0000001 http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/description http://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#hasDefinition http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#isDefinedBy http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/HP_0040005

[egonw]

OK, nice list! Indeed, not all are currently translated by Slimmer...

[JKChang2015]

List of un-defined terms un-defined terms.xlsx

In which:

Ontology	No. of un-defined terms
CCONT	12
NCIT	37
NPO	438
ENM	262
BTO	11
CHEBI	70
ENVO	177
OAE	35
PATO	8
STATO	1
FIX	17
CHEMINF	129
BAO	173
EFO	705

[JKChang2015]

List of un-defined terms: un-defined terms.xlsx