Eivind Næss
Eivind Næss
@jkroonza - Could you please inform us of the use-case for this change?
@pali I did checked out the issue, #343 and it is firewall related. I still don't see a particular reason to take it.
It would make it a lot easier to resolve this if we got the autotools change merged. Looks like it currently has some merge conflicts and it would need some...
I think I'd want to play around with this a bit too. Also, capabilities are inherited right? So, pppd also does fork/exec of other processes like ip-up/down, etc? Also, are...
As I am reading through the thread, I'd be really curious who is asking for this feature and why? Considering the security model, and all the ip-up/down scripts. Just being...
@Neustradamus what do you mean? I am a bit confused.
Well, okay. The Makefile.linux no longer exist. No risk of clobbering the change now. Still my comment from Jul 22 still stands. We could take a change like this, but...
@pali Does this look reasonable? @Discovery00 - You should be able to open a Pull Request against the ppp/master branch and sign off the code. You able to do this?
Typically firewall developers have been using a match on interface with a wildcard. For example, ``` iptables -i ppp+ ..., iptables -o ppp+ ``` Would you be able to work...
@Neustradamus I believe @jjkeijser assessment is correct. You can now specify --with-openssl=/path/to/OpenSSL/3.0.0/install/location --disable-openssl-engine to compile against 3.0.0. I did compile against 3.0.0 once. Not sure what API they would have...