Emanuel Pilz

Sounds good to me. I am down to implement that option if that comes to be the case. Feel free to tag me then, as I probably won't be actively...

> Is this expected to change the API from the user's perspective? This PR? No. The WIP Packed CBOR impl? Not at the moment. At its current state we simply...

> A few of the `ciborium` tests aren't passing. You mean any tests beyond the four mentioned in the PR?

`E0` i.e. `Simple(0)` for example. Specifically `Simple(0..19)` and `Simple(32..255)` can't be parsed or produced. `Simple(23)` (`undefined`) can be parsed (as `Option::None`), but not produced afaik (`Option::None` produces `Simple(22)`/`NULL`). I need...

> The Value struct should only contain semantically interpreted values. Oh, do they? Tags also aren't semantic and they have a Value representation. > But what is the semantic meaning...

No idea if this is essential, probably not. I just think it's fun to implement. As a matter of fact the four of us are students working on this as...

> Does it help to re-assign the shortcuts to the exact same, showing their [special character equivalent](https://github.com/zen-browser/desktop/issues/7230#issuecomment-2799062041)? Not for me. (Windows amd64)