Evan Mesterhazy

@arxanas no offense meant, but I still don't think you've given an explanation of why a non interactive split command is more useful as the default. You said you're philosophically...

> I think @arxanas's argument was that `jj split ` is not interactive, unless `` happens to be empty, so I can see that being a footgun. Is that true...

Oh, I think we are all talking about different things. There's the interactive diff picker, and there's an interactive prompt to enter a commit message. I think a large portion...

Is this for reporting jj bugs? Maybe something like this should be nested under `jj debug`. Rage is a cheeky name for the command, but `jj debug report` is probably...

Fixing this upstream ended up being more complicated than I thought it would be and might require a change to the data model. I'm out for a week but I'm...

I've been thinking about this a bit more and would like to propose that we change the current behavior. Currently, the ~branch~ bookmark follows the child revision, moving forward the...

Is there a issue open for the `jj squash -A` flag? I'm having trouble finding it and it doesn't look like that flag exists currently. The symmetry is definitely nice...

FYI for readers, there's a substantial amount of additional discussion about the merits of this change in the pull request: - https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/5618#discussion_r1948029105

> Use `jj split -i` instead of `jj commit`. It seems pretty clear this this is a workaround for the fact that there's no good way to add commits and...

Based on the discussion in https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/5618, we are going to do the following: 1. Change the default behavior so that the change id moves to the second commit. This will...