No emails shown in K9 on android
I am running the bridge locally on my android device and I dont see emails showing up. It used to work a few days ago, but it stopped working now
Here is the log
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR AUTH=PLAIN] IMAP4rev1 Service Ready
1 AUTHENTICATE PLAIN
+
2021/02/02 14:19:32 >> POST /api/auth/refresh
2021/02/02 14:19:32 {"RefreshToken":"8dc604b031lolveryfunjy","ResponseType":"token","GrantType":"refresh_token","RedirectURI":"http://www.protonmail.ch"}
2021/02/02 14:19:33 << POST /api/auth/refresh
2021/02/02 14:19:33 &protonmail.authResp{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Auth:protonmail.Auth{ExpiresAt:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:0, loc:(*time.Location)(nil)}, Scope:"full self payments keys parent user loggedin nondelinquent mail calendar", UID:"4f7e8888d11610bfab9d2c00c51ac881919eea3d", AccessToken:"2b446b2dabd4900c2dbaae055764sjwjjsjwjwj6c6", RefreshToken:"591411d3bf7635c2hsjsjshhs334dcff029cb", UserID:"", EventID:"", PasswordMode:0, TwoFactor:struct { Enabled int; U2F interface {}; TOTP int }{Enabled:0, U2F:interface {}(nil), TOTP:0}}, ExpiresIn:864000, TokenType:"Bearer", ServerProof:""}
2021/02/02 14:19:33 >> GET /api/addresses
2021/02/02 14:19:34 << GET /api/addresses
2021/02/02 14:19:34 &struct { protonmail.resp; Addresses []*protonmail.Address }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Addresses:[]*protonmail.Address{(*protonmail.Address)(0xb8202370), (*protonmail.Address)(0xb82023c0)}}
2021/02/02 14:19:35 >> GET /api/users
2021/02/02 14:19:35 << GET /api/users
2021/02/02 14:19:35 &struct { protonmail.resp; User *protonmail.User }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, User:(*protonmail.User)(0xb8078370)}
2021/02/02 14:19:35 >> GET /api/addresses
2021/02/02 14:19:36 << GET /api/addresses
2021/02/02 14:19:36 &struct { protonmail.resp; Addresses []*protonmail.Address }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Addresses:[]*protonmail.Address{(*protonmail.Address)(0xb80a4140), (*protonmail.Address)(0xb80a4230)}}
2021/02/02 14:19:36 >> GET /api/labels
2021/02/02 14:19:36 << GET /api/labels
2021/02/02 14:19:36 &struct { protonmail.resp; Labels []*protonmail.Label }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Labels:[]*protonmail.Label{(*protonmail.Label)(0xb8480150), (*protonmail.Label)(0xb8480180)}}
2021/02/02 14:19:36 >> GET /api/messages/count
2021/02/02 14:19:36 << GET /api/messages/count
2021/02/02 14:19:36 &struct { protonmail.resp; Counts []*protonmail.MessageCount }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Counts:[]*protonmail.MessageCount{(*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c7e0), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c800), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c810), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c820), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c840), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c850), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c870), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c880), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c890), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c8b0), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c8c0), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c8d0), (*protonmail.MessageCount)(0xb849c8e0)}}
2021/02/02 14:19:36 User "astroanax" logged in via IMAP
1 OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR MOVE] AUTHENTICATE completed
2021/02/02 14:19:36 >> GET /api/events/latest
2 EXAMINE "INBOX"
* FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Flagged \Draft dev social)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Seen \Deleted \Flagged \Draft dev social)] Flags permitted.
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1] UIDs valid
* 6 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDNEXT 7] Predicted next UID
2 OK [READ-ONLY] EXAMINE completed
3 UID SEARCH 1:6 NOT DELETED
2021/02/02 14:19:36 Synchronizing mailbox INBOX...
2021/02/02 14:19:36 >> GET /api/messages
2021/02/02 14:19:36 << GET /api/events/latest
2021/02/02 14:19:36 &struct { protonmail.resp; *protonmail.Event }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Event:(*protonmail.Event)(0xb80a6540)}
2021/02/02 14:19:37 << GET /api/messages
2021/02/02 14:19:37 &struct { protonmail.resp; Total int; Messages []*protonmail.Message }{resp:protonmail.resp{Code:1000, RawAPIError:(*protonmail.RawAPIError)(nil)}, Total:6, Messages:[]*protonmail.Message{(*protonmail.Message)(0xb81100d0), (*protonmail.Message)(0xb8110270), (*protonmail.Message)(0xb8110340), (*protonmail.Message)(0xb8110410), (*protonmail.Message)(0xb81104e0), (*protonmail.Message)(0xb81105b0)}}
2021/02/02 14:19:37 Synchronizing mailbox INBOX: done.
3 NO search queries with NOT or OR clauses are not yet implemented
2021/02/02 14:20:06 >> GET /api/events/OO2My2ZlQlzdgMLVBfz4RtPNdzU_Ego9j1KJdROrBb-FNH6xmXBPQE2pprNRMOu-QL4c-EpKZKsq4DnfSDnOZw==
2021/02/02 14:20:07 << GET /api/events/OO2My2ZlQlzdgMLVBfz4RtPNdzU_Ego9j1KJdROrBb-FNH6xmXBPQE2pprNRMOu-QL4c-EpKZKsq4DnfSDnOZw==
The above log is the result when I try to refresh k9 by pressing the load 25 more emails button. I would like to point out that this doesnt work with other apps too, and that sending email isnt a problem, ony fetching it seems broken
3 UID SEARCH 1:6 NOT DELETED
3 NO search queries with NOT or OR clauses are not yet implemented
Probably a K-9 Mail update. We probably could add support for this special case.
It also didnt work under samsung email
@emersion can you say if there is any progress on this?
I'm not working on it.
I would definitely love if this was fixed at some point. K-9 is so good and I love this bridge!
I was playing around with the codebase, and I found a hacky solution. In fact, seems that official Protonmail bridge does not work for k9 either, and inspecting this repository that patches it to have support, I managed to implement to implement a fix in this fork
If that's ok, I can open a PR to the main repository
I was playing around with the codebase, and I found a hacky solution. In fact, seems that official Protonmail bridge does not work for k9 either, and inspecting this repository that patches it to have support, I managed to implement to implement a fix in this fork
If that's ok, I can open a PR to the main repository
If you're using hydroxide through Termux, I have already fixed this issue in that package: https://github.com/termux/termux-packages/pull/9431
This "fix" is incorrect. It completely ignores NOT clauses in search queries.
This "fix" is incorrect. It completely ignores
NOTclauses in search queries.
Mine, theirs, or both? Either way at least it works
Well, both patches are exactly the same AFAIK.
at least it works
And it'll be terribly broken if the client does something else than NOT unimportant-criteria.
Please ask your users to not report any issues to this repository. I don't have time to provide support for copies of hydroxide with broken patches applied.
I'll leave a note in my fork making clear that it is hacky and has no support, no worries
Is the project just dead? Not working with android clients is a bit of a bummer