Elizabeth DuPre

> @emdupre, I believe that the only problem with your dataset is that the T1w volumes need to be squeezed from 4D to 3D. Also, sub-16 only has partial physio...

This is a great idea, @rmarkello ! I think I'd like to wait on implementing it until we resolve #14 (which is yielding issues in #18), since the ideal workflow...

Is this still being considered @rmarkello ? I didn't see it in #418 ?

The Turing Way also has a chapter on reviewing pull requests that might be useful to link to ! https://the-turing-way.netlify.app/collaboration/github/github-maintainers.html

How does this interact with #425 ?

I'm a strong +1 on this ! Less strong feelings on #425, but it makes sense to me to pursue both at once since they'll hit the same lines.

Some initial feedback I have -- obviously there's quite a lot going on right now, but that's definitely useful for figuring out all of the pieces of the workflow !...

Copying in other feedback from gitter: Joshua Teves @jbteves 10:54 > I agree with the messy flowchart guiding further modularization; in an ideal world our code would make a pretty...

@handwerkerd is there a plan to add your updated flowcharts into the docs somewhere ?

This figure came up in discussions on #\680. Do we have any updates, here ? Although a Esteban-style figure might be a bit further off, should we at least update...