PCAPdroid icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
PCAPdroid copied to clipboard

Firewall as not paid feature . FR

Open DI555 opened this issue 3 years ago • 5 comments

would you please to make integrated firewall be free feature. many people use other firewalls, but would skip to newer one.. ..so, that will bring much more users than now!!!

as new paid feature would suggest new bunch of colorful themes to choose! not bad for many paid users!!!

thank you in advance!

DI555 avatar Feb 06 '23 05:02 DI555

Hi, have you installed the app from Google Play? The app was born as a traffic monitoring app and my approach for monetization is that features not related to its core function should be paid. Are your concerned about the price of the firewall feature?

emanuele-f avatar Feb 06 '23 12:02 emanuele-f

no, not at all, i'm just fan of donation software strategies.., and thought that if Firewall feature would be a free feature, - more people would leave theirs firewalls and use PCAPdroid! so, you would have much more users of the app! and of course some other paid features plus my suggested paid feature would bring not less, but even imo better, monetization!

DI555 avatar Feb 06 '23 13:02 DI555

In my opinion the app already has some great and unique features provided for free like the packet capturing and the latest TLS decryption capability which should already attract more people to the App. Infact there was no premium offering in the app until 6 months ago (even with tls decryption implemented) and it was being developed for more than 2 years by the dev prior to it. So he best knows how donations worked(s) for him. (Not to mention , the motivation behind developing the app was/is not entirely monetary)

As the developer said, the firewall was not made to be marketed as the core features of the app . There are a bunch of firewall-related apps popping up in the market right now which are bringing different features as per users demands. This will require pcapdroid to shift its focus from its core function to cater such feature requests. And at one point it would be too much for one single app to offer and for the users to not get confused.

Also in my personal experience, i feel majority of the users won't appreciate the work done on the app ,even when all features are offered for free. The users who already find the core features useful (like network monitoring /tls decryption) would definitely see the value in using premium firewall feature as well. So , I currently like this implementation.

kevin0t avatar Feb 10 '23 12:02 kevin0t

In part I also agree with @DI555 that providing the firewall for free would attract new users, in particular foss users. Purchasing paid features via the unlock token is not that simple and it relies on Google Play, so such users may try and probably continue to use other firewall apps, which are available for free. Maybe we could provide some basic firewall functions for free (e.g. only blocking of apps), and more advanced as paid (e.g. whitelist mode, ip/domain blocking, autoblock new apps, etc.).

emanuele-f avatar Feb 10 '23 17:02 emanuele-f

Maybe we could provide some basic firewall functions for free (e.g. only blocking of apps), and more advanced as paid (e.g. whitelist mode, ip/domain blocking, autoblock new apps, etc.).

sounds good. I think netguard also does the same thing.

kevin0t avatar Feb 10 '23 18:02 kevin0t