Poor results?

Open gigadeplex opened this issue 6 years ago • 3 comments

After training it on 110k iterations (paper trained it on 100k) this is the result. It seems very different from the paper, have I done something wrong? I must add that I trained it on normal celeba not hq.

Sep 21 '19 23:09 gigadeplex

Actually, we're still working on this repo. But I'm busy with other things so it could take a few weeks. We assure that you can get the same result as those on the paper from https://github.com/willylulu/RelGAN, which is our original codebase. This PyTorch version is translated from the Keras one.

Sep 22 '19 08:09 elvisyjlin

Hi, I want to know will they have much difference in the results of the celebA dataset between that of the celebA-HQ dataset?

Nov 27 '19 23:11 HelenMao

I met the same issue using normal CelebA and seemingly it doesn't work at all...

Mar 13 '20 22:03 KelestZ