ellnix

> We are using the ~> 0.26.0 so it should already allow you to update your meilisearch-ruby and meilisearch-rails version, no? `~>` only allows an update to the patch version,...

> @ellnix I'm ok if you raise the dependency to `>= 0.26.0` I think we should stick with `~>` and updating the version manually. If I change the requirement to...

I believe this was implemented on #367

This should not be difficult to implement but I can predict a data race occurring: Say I have document "constitution" with field "first_line": - User changes "first_line" to "All puppies...

I did discuss it with Bruno in the past and he agreed that it would be a good feature to be able to opt into: https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch-rails/issues/187#issuecomment-1753138744 However I prioritized refactoring...

@brunoocasali Do you have any ideas regarding this or should we work toward using a different request backend? I could try porting the ms-ruby gem to [http.rb](https://github.com/httprb/http) (which doesn't use...

Apologies for the delay on this. I made a branch with some dirty edits that use httprb instead of httparty. You should be able to use it by specifying this...

> Appreciate the effort guys, i am happy to test once you got a PoC. Not that i have a better idea, but is there a reason to believe it...

Implemented a (bad) solution for retries, live on that ms-ruby branch. It shouldn't cause any issues except maybe performance ones because I use `sleep`, but it should not run often...

> If it does not already, would be good to log when it has to retry so we have some idea if retries are still happening and can try to...