Elad Alon

@dontcallmedom

I am not opposed to adding a spec note, but I don't think it would be impactful enough for us to declare "mission accomplished." Is there anyone knowledgeable about GC...

> 1. Throwing on options that some browsers may parse and others may not adds unnecessary web compat headaches This issue would only affect the user agents that *did* implement...

IIUC, this issue can be summarized as: > [Not a real quote. Paraphrasing.] > When the user grants a permission, that permission is keyed on the top-level, and is shared...

@beaufortfrancois

Gentle ping @jan-ivar and @youennf.

Thanks, Youenn. I think we're aligned on what the spec should say, then, and are working out how to say it. I like all options presented, but let's devil's advocate...

That's what I mean with an exit-step, yes.

> This preference seems mostly targeted to a particular User Agent (Chrome) UI and I do not think it is something we can leverage in existing macOS UI. Hasn't Apple...

It's a bit sad that we could not resolve this discussion in 2.5 years. The bar mentioned by both @jan-ivar and @youennf was "Web developer interest." We have that [here](https://g-issues.chromium.org/issues/40815819)....