Mathias Kraus
Mathias Kraus
@lalten would that mean that you also need iceoryx v2.95 in ros2.repos file?
@orecham this is the issue you can use for the adjustment of the Python build
@lalten the bzlmod code came from a community member and I'm not that familiar with the code. Can you specify which public targets are affected by the dev dependencies?
Okay, the `buildifier` is definitely a dev dependency. The `iceoryx_hoofs_testing` is actually also a dev dependency but I'm not sure how this could be modeled with bazel. It is basically...
Okay, this is weird. Why should the `buildifier` be needed in order to build `iceoryx_hoofs`? Bazel has some weird dependency handling. Do you have time to check it there is...
> > Okay, this is weird. Why should the `buildifier` be needed in order to build `iceoryx_hoofs`? Bazel has some weird dependency handling. > > Do you have time to...
Having the tests for the users is perfectly fine. It's the `buildifier` that is totally irrelevant to the consumers to the library. Currently, the `bazel/BUILD.bazel` file is empty. Would it...
Agreed with the buildifier not being part of the bazel grahp. But since not all of our contributors are using bazel, we cannot rely on the commit hooks. A CI...
Do you know it this is compatible with bazel 6.2?
Are you able to check this? It might be old, but we have users who are still using it, so we need to keep it working.