Eric K Richardson
Eric K Richardson
I seems there is a regression or change in behavior from 1.4.0 to 1.4.1. See https://github.com/lightbend/config/commit/379a1f056cc57e7ebfd1c0b2e8b94591b082494b
Maybe just using `provided` at the end as that is the term and syntax used now for dependencies?
Template check implemented in https://github.com/scala-native/scala-native.g8/pull/56
You can vote about Scala.js dropping Scala 2.11 here as that would be a good indication that Scala Native could drop support too - https://github.com/scala-js/scala-js/issues/4759
Good news. It is happening. https://github.com/scala-js/scala-js/pull/4761
@yuly16 Thanks for this improvement.
Perhaps we can close via https://github.com/scala-native/scala-native/pull/2777 and https://github.com/scala-native/scala-native/pull/2998
I think the proposal looks great but have a few questions and concerns. Currently we have Stack Allocation as follows: ``` def stackalloc[T](implicit tag: Tag[T]): Ptr[T] = undefined def stackalloc[T](n:...
Just a quick followup. There are two different types of stack allocation in C, objects and arrays. It can be shown as follows in Scala like syntax with as in...
@densh Since we are going to have implicit stack allocation via `new` for `struct` and new C arrays etc., could you consider removing `stackalloc` all together? ``` // currently var...