Eric J. Smith

> Hi, @michael-budnik. > > There are no plans to reintroduce the removed interfaces in the v8 design. > > Ultimately I don't believe these interfaces serve a purpose and...

I don't see how this is a real world issue and it seems better to error on the safe side because if we have an issue incrementing the attempts afterward...

I find that scenario highly unlikely and the opposite scenario of us not being able to increment the counter after attempting and then re-attempting infinite amount of times is much...

I am ok with adding headers to the RequestInfo. I think the object is pretty big already. We need to apply the same exclusions and yeah we should make sure...

I think you can pretty easily disable modules being collected altogether. I think what would be a generally useful feature is if you can see the fully populated event right...

I think you want to control these things separately, but agree that it is confusing. I think just because I want to see info level logging in my application log...

Yeah, I guess, but it can also blow up your account real quick and then make our service useless. That is a big concern for me. How about we require...

But I don't expect a lot of logs. I want to use the same mechanism that I already send errors to throughout my application (logging), but just because I want...

> > I'm not sure I've seen any other targets do that. I think we just keep it simple, if you are using logging target you expect lots of logs....

I agree that it needs to be part of default excludes. The problem with doing it server side is that it's assuming a specific platform / language and is not...