eiz
Is there interest in continuing this project if the signing situation could be solved?
Title says it all. I'm evaluating options to have this signed. But that effort only makes sense if there is someone interested in continuing development.
By development, I mean being committed to making it work on future Windows versions, not adding features.
There are certainly people who will make it work on a future Windows version so as long as WASAPI devices and ASIO exist on those versions.
use: https://github.com/HyperSine/Windows10-CustomKernelSigners/blob/master/README.md
use: https://github.com/HyperSine/Windows10-CustomKernelSigners/blob/master/README.md
Too much of a hassle when I just wanna make funny sound effects with it.
I was hoping this project would be continued and drivers signed. But being forced to look for an alternative I was able to replicate the SAR functionality using VB-Audio Matrix. I'm sure there's more things you can do with it, but I just needed it to pass all windows audio through a DAW and then out again. https://vb-audio.com/Matrix
How's the latency on that? One of the main advantages of SAR for me is the ability to use really low buffer sizes
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024, 13:40 sezitas @.***> wrote:
I was hoping this project would be continued and drivers signed. But being forced to look for an alternative I was able to replicate the SAR functionality using VB-Audio Matrix. I'm sure there's more things you can do with it, but I just needed it to pass all windows audio through a DAW and then out again. https://vb-audio.com/Matrix
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/eiz/SynchronousAudioRouter/issues/135#issuecomment-2018436202, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATM3HVVY2DWR5MCWMI7NXQTY2BHQNAVCNFSM6AAAAAAYERX6TKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMJYGQZTMMRQGI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
I play guitar with a VST in the same DAW with this setup, and haven't sensed any additional latency compared to SAR. I just made sure to use the same Sample Rates across the Virtual devices with the real one (Scarlett solo). However my setup is not that complex and I don't think I know enough to comment on this. Check out their forums and also try it out. The software is Donationware.
How's the latency on that? One of the main advantages of SAR for me is the ability to use really low buffer sizes
Matrix uses same drivers as VB-Cable. These are not even synchronous and they use require pretty large buffers (usually ~1500 samples in total as sane default) because they have to recover clock from source and even with this they can sometimes cause a drop off. The only software products which does synch clock on your output (where you specify output device as clock source for your virtual input) are SAR and ASIO Link Pro. Sadly I don't know of any other real alternatives.
I managed to figure out how to get the self signed driver working with the guides and I might write up my own because it did take me a long ass time to actually process it all. Hopefully if I do, it will be more user friendly/easier to follow.
