Enrico Tröger
Enrico Tröger
Nice! LGBI. Should we test the changes actually? I'm wondering if it is worth to try, I agree that it's highly theoretically.
@b4n btw, some or all of these commits are also slipped in #4472. I guess this was not on purpose.
Looks very good. Two minor remarks: - maybe we could add a short comment in https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4023/files#diff-42b5b46e89c71a2aee5d52adee0a80fcfa424aad9a00c27a81118279bd64c69aR383 and https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4023/files#diff-8396dc9c2232193e29aaeddbcf7fa02add25c3c2b855f56c3e5307dc34fcfcf3R1020 to explain why we are doing this - I noticed if the...
> @eht16 also note all the discussion on #4017 and the addition options. Be patient with me :). I was posting there while you posted here.
Yes, even if the difference is a little subtile: The existing `Next Error` / `Previous Error` keybindings are bound tightly to the compiler output window in the bottom. To have...
In https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/4238/files#diff-671c075a0147780a6a32523995c3d4345e4569fd70502518adf144784b9a04c5R7, I used a more specific pattern. Though '*' is probably also fine as we create tags only manually and only for releases. Testing is quite hard, yes. I...
I don't really have a preference, for me we can go with yours.
This is currently not possible. The long line marker is drawn by the Scintilla library and it has a fixed width. Feel free to request this feature at the Scintilla...
See https://github.com/orgs/linuxmint/discussions/615#discussioncomment-14057203. I think Geany already has a different feature which is even better suited for the mentioned use case.