Ehsan Akhgari

> And I think one that needs to be answered as part of the discussion with the ads industry as well as the web development community. Why are those two...

> I was hoping this was addressed by the bullet > > > The notion of "First Party" may expand beyond eTLD+1, e.g. as proposed in [First Party Sets](https://mikewest.github.io/first-party-sets/). The...

> Do you feel that enforcing that distinction is technically feasible? Firefox is shipping code based on it, so yes. If you're asking the question of "can the browser infer...

> All of the web resources created by Google, Facebook, and the New York Times are first parties when this definition is applied to me as a user. That is,...

> It seems like we're going to need a Talmud to explain the detailed reasoning behind word choices here. slightly_smiling_face (That's not a bad thing, just a non-obvious requirement.) To...

> This looks great! Would it be possible to amend the proposal to allow for configuring what storage policy should be imposed on each origin (session length storage, no storage,...

I think a good UX for a password field would be one where the user could click on a button and reveal the contents of the password box. If a...

I think this may be happening since the add-on is not signed. You can turn on the extensions.logging.enabled pref and look at the browser console for the log messages from...

> I personally don't like adding this global state since the spec already provides RequestCache for bypassing HTTP cache. I think the reason for this proposal is giving the users...

Note that Facebook is proposing changing what the reload button does by making it only validate the main page but not subresources, and apparently Chrome is on board. If that...