Eric Holk
Does anyone know why variable-length SIMD architectures fell out of favor? Understanding that might be informative in deciding whether we should add variable-length SIMD to Wasm.
The abstract has been submitted and accepted, so the next step is to actually make the talk.
I've been busy with travel and such but I'm planning to get working on this in earnest next week.
This is completed! If curious, you can watch the talk [here](https://www.youtube.com/live/ZNK4aSv-krI?si=FHow-tttWBWA6TzM&t=528).
@rfcbot merge
I wonder if it's worth linking and/or quoting this section from the sync meeting policy: > - **No side conversations in chat**: The chat functionality is only used to raise...
> Has any thought been given to how this might be used in library APIs? One could of course return an `impl IntoIterator`, but this is usually sub-optimal for various...
> That doesn't help with the fundamental problem of wanting to name a concrete type though, or implement other traits. You might be able to work around the concrete type...
> My biggest concern is that this is supposed to be about a macro for iterator creation, but it can use `yield` too, which isn't available in Stable, so it's...
> Why can't the yield keyword be stabilized on its own, without this macro. That doesn't seem to be discussed in Rationale and alternatives, though the RFC is so long...