Eduardo Gulias Davis

Hi! While they would be worrisome for sure, they are probably semantically correct. The lib is for validating the address composition, not for spam check or similar features. With this...

@rrjanbiah I'd like to understand your point of view. Could you please elaborate?

Hi @rrjanbiah , Yes, took your suggestions and made them space in v3 of the library by adding the possibility to have "extra" validations (check the Contributing file). While I'll...

Relates to #176

Hi @jrchamp it looks like we are not, as stated in the readme: supported RFCs are 5321, 5322, 6530, 6531, 6532. Are you suggesting/asking to add support for this format?

Hi @jrchamp , it took me some more this time. Added your request as issue #195 Thanks for the clear documentation.

Hi @sraveh can you provide a sample (a PR with a failing test would be awesome) so I can put it through the tests? Thanks!

Hi @bbottema , I'll take a look and find some time to address them. I'll ping you on the other thread after reviewing them. Happy new year!

Thanks @crishoj . Released under 4.0.2

Sorry, won't merge.