Egon Willighagen

Results 303 comments of Egon Willighagen

More info: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00739 With Vladimir Lobaskin

For the first, options include: * https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/CHMO?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2FCHMO_0002016 * https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/NCIT?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fncicb.nci.nih.gov%2Fxml%2Fowl%2FEVS%2FThesaurus.owl%23C120681 For the second, there are no clear options.

We worked on this yesterday, and made great progress. We have a plan, that I need to work out.

Feel free to make one PR for each term, if you want to discuss the term in more detail.

Yeah, the NPO shows how this can be done. See this patch: https://github.com/sobolevnrm/npo/commit/b24c95614e3a3928c70b6e90a2445a2dc77cd24d Particularly, check lines 14472-14482 ... So, the link is not a single predicate...

Latest draft of that document (Jan 2017): https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13564/appendix_4_nano_registration_committees_en.pdf/1abb12d1-88a2-b386-0907-c67d05105378 It writes: "A 'nanoform' is a substance that meets the requirements of the Commission Recommendation for the definition of nanomaterial [refs] (hereafter,...

I'm now using obo:STATO_0000035 in the ENMRDF...

Interesting suggestion. I suggest a two step solution: 1. add as aliases to Wikidata 2. update the script to make an OWL ontology and pull in those aliases The first...

Copied upstream: https://github.com/BioAssayOntology/BAO/issues/25

Yes, we should keep both of these, but one is an (image) descriptor... the other has apaprently two definitions: largest/smallest and smallest/largest, which you know gives nanoQSAR issues :) The...