test: add OSSF Scorecard
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
New Features
- Introduced an automated workflow that performs supply-chain security analysis. This enhancement triggers on scheduled events and key code updates, ensuring that security scanning results are automatically generated and integrated with the code scanning dashboard for enhanced visibility.
Walkthrough
The pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file designed to perform supply-chain security analysis using the Scorecard tool. The workflow triggers on branch protection events, pushes to the "next" and "master" branches, and via a cron schedule every Monday at 18:37 UTC. It checks out the code, executes the analysis, uploads artifacts, and optionally publishes the results to GitHub’s code scanning dashboard, with specific permission and retention configurations.
Changes
| File(s) | Change Summary |
|---|---|
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml |
Added a new workflow for supply-chain security analysis: triggers on branch protection, scheduled cron, and pushes; runs Scorecard analysis; uploads artifacts; optionally publishes results to the code scanning dashboard. |
Sequence Diagram(s)
sequenceDiagram
participant E as Event Trigger (branch, push, cron)
participant W as Workflow Runner (Ubuntu)
participant C as Code Checkout
participant S as Scorecard Analysis
participant A as Artifact Uploader
participant P as Scanning Publisher
E->>W: Trigger workflow
W->>C: Checkout repository
W->>S: Run Scorecard analysis
S->>A: Generate SARIF report and upload
A->>W: Confirm upload
alt Publish Enabled
S->>P: Publish results to code scanning dashboard
end
Poem
I'm a coding rabbit, quick and keen,
Hopping through workflows, a sight to be seen.
Scorecard hops in to check our chain,
Uploading reports while I nibble on grain.
A secure code garden, where bugs refrain,
Hooray for progress—let's cheer again!
🐰🌟
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro
📥 Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a48cfaaad3e00dcf2291ab1b8ba3757385fc85af and 4a305c7f1f112cc11f3d3887419e96853ec1f45f.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
-
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (15)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (macos-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 22)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 22)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (windows-latest, 18)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 20)
- GitHub Check: Node.js / Test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
- GitHub Check: Scorecard analysis
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/workflows/scorecard.yml (10)
1-4: Third-Party Action Disclaimer:The introductory comments clearly warn users that actions used here are not officially certified by GitHub. This is a good security precaution. Please ensure that any third-party actions are periodically reviewed for vulnerabilities.
5-5: Workflow Naming: Clear and DescriptiveThe workflow name "Scorecard supply-chain security" immediately informs users of its purpose.
6-18: Workflow Triggers: Comprehensive Event CoverageThe workflow is triggered on multiple events including branch protection rules, a scheduled cron job, push events, and pull requests. This multi-trigger setup helps ensure timely and consistent security analysis.
Note: Verify that the
branch_protection_ruleevent is fully supported in your repository environment, as its behavior may differ based on repository settings.
19-20: Default Permissions: Minimal by DesignSetting default permissions to
read-allfollows the principle of least privilege, reducing the risk of unintended modifications.
22-34: Job Configuration: Secure and Well-ScopedThe "Scorecard analysis" job is configured to run on
ubuntu-latestwith job-level permissions set appropriately:
security-events: writeallows uploading of results.id-token: writeis needed for publishing.The commented-out optional permissions for private repositories provide useful guidance for adapting this workflow, if needed.
35-40: Checkout Step: Best Practices in ActionThe checkout step uses a pinned commit (
actions/checkout@b4ffde65f46336ab88eb53be808477a3936bae11) to enhance stability and security. The optionpersist-credentials: falsefurther strengthens credential handling.
41-51: Scorecard Analysis Step: Clear and ConfigurableThe "Run analysis" step leverages the
ossf/scorecard-actionwith clearly defined parameters for output:
- Results are written to
results.sarifin SARIF format.- Detailed comments guide users on how to optionally enable a PAT token for enhanced functionality.
Ensure that the pinned version (
ossf/scorecard-action@0864cf19026789058feabb7e87baa5f140aac736) meets your project’s security and functionality requirements.
52-60: Publishing Settings: Well ExplainedThe configuration block explains the implications for public versus private repositories. Setting
publish_results: trueis appropriate for public repositories to facilitate the Scorecard badge and OpenSSF API integration.
61-69: Artifact Upload Step: Properly ConfiguredUploading the SARIF file as an artifact with a 5-day retention period helps in preserving analysis results while managing storage efficiently.
70-75: Upload to Code-Scanning: Seamless IntegrationThe final step uploads results to GitHub’s Code Scanning dashboard using the
github/codeql-action/upload-sarifaction. Ensure that Code Scanning is enabled in your repository for this integration to function as expected.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
-
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it. -
Generate unit testing code for this file. -
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
-
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:-
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file. -
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
-
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:-
@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase. -
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code. -
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format. -
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
-
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
-
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR. -
@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews. -
@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. -
@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. -
@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR. -
@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR. -
@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. -
@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. -
@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Codecov Report
:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 83.59%. Comparing base (8e433d9) to head (4a305c7).
:warning: Report is 105 commits behind head on next.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #5405 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 94.91% 83.59% -11.33%
===========================================
Files 40 153 +113
Lines 3774 9665 +5891
Branches 352 1592 +1240
===========================================
+ Hits 3582 8079 +4497
- Misses 192 1409 +1217
- Partials 0 177 +177
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.