Enrico Gregorio

Pursuing @blefloch 's idea, if I add ```latex \global\let\df@label\@empty ``` to the code of `\endalign`, just before `\restorealignstate@` (it's code that's executed only when `\ifingather@` returns true), then the example...

`amscd` globally makes `@` math active, but this is nullified by `unicode-math`. On the other hand, the math code assignment is important only inside `amscd`, so a fix is to...

If we look at `\iint`, we see that it's defined as ``` \DOTSI\MultiIntegral{2} ``` and similarly for `\iiint` and `\iiiint`. This is important if there is `\dots` in front of...

After discussion, the Team's opinion is that we're not going to implement this, unless there are good use cases in the literature. There is a small conflict with Unicode math,...

It *could* make sense to do ```latex \edef\xrightarrow{\DOTSB\unexpanded\expandafter{\xrightarrow}} ``` after the definition of `\xrightarrow`. This would make the command to react to `\dots` just like all other relation symbols, but...

I _guess_ it's because the combining comma below works badly with Latin Modern: ```latex \documentclass{article} \usepackage{fontspec} \begin{document} \def\test{% \textcommabelow S \textcommabelow V V^^^^0326\par } \test \fontspec{DejaVu Serif}\test \fontspec{Old Standard}\test \end{document}...

@car222222 Unicode does not distinguish between cedilla and comma below, leaving the rendering to the font designer. Latvian tradition uses comma below (and above in the case of lowercase g)...

@car222222 What I wanted to underline is that, notwithstanding Latvian has _always_ used a comma below, Unicode decided to arbitrarily name it “cedilla”.