Bindings of t, T, o, O

[jxy]

The keys, t, T, o, O, behave rather unexpected, considering they have rather standard usage in vi/vim. Perhaps you want to leave them to evil-leader, or at least let people choose whether to enable them or not.

[kalafut]

My two cents: o and O seem fairly natural. They're not exactly the same behavior as Vim, but close. t and T are nothing like Vim but I think they work, at least for me, since the "todo" concept is occurring to so often.

[pesterhazy]

Trying out evil-org-mode, I was also confused by the behavior of O. In vim, O inserts a line before the current line. The new behavior inserts a line after the current line, so it's the opposite of what you'd expect.

Fortunately I don't use t much, but I imagine people who use it will be confused by this change as well.

[edwtjo]

I added these as a matter of convenience for my work flow, but perhaps they should be redone.

[sooheon]

I actually like o, but I agree with O being strange. It's the only binding I've removed.

[casimir]

The only thing preventing me for using this mode is these binding. No kidding those are 2 things I use massively in vi-mode. Would it be possible to add an option tu use alternate bindings as suggested @jxy?

[Somelauw]

I use the following work-around:

(evil-define-key 'normal evil-org-mode-map
    (kbd "t") 'evil-find-char-to
    (kbd "T") 'evil-find-char-to-backward
    (kbd "C-t") 'org-todo
    (kbd "O") 'evil-open-above
    (kbd "H") 'org-shiftleft
    (kbd "L") 'org-shiftright)