Edwin Hayes

@tridge @peterbarker @DonLakeFlyer @rmackay9 @LorenzMeier @tilaktilak

@DonLakeFlyer - `MAV_CMD_DO_REPOSITION` is only good for WGS84 frame; AFAIK there are no equivalents for other frames (for instance, local)? @peterbarker - In addition to the stated behaviours, does AP...

@hamishwillee - Well, I guess I'll see how much work it looks to be in order to get consistent implementations first, and then decide if its too hard basket.

@DonLakeFlyer - Do the fields just become incorrectly named in that case?

Ok yeah I see. I believe ArduCopter does support local? If PX4 doesn't, it might shortly, depending on how generous [one of our customers] is with their code. And pursuant...

I'm ambivalent about the idea that they are different use cases, but regardless I think it raises the question about what the correct behaviour should be when the two types...

> I'll just throw this in here... what these messages report isn't actually where the vehicle is currently headed - if it's doing avoidance it could very well be going...

Ok then, pursuant to drafting a PR for discussion: what would people prefer for the case, as Peter mentioned above, that the time arrives that the flight controller is supposed...

> what is trying to be accomplished here and why. Even if everyone agrees that the `SET_TARGET` mechanism should not be used for guided mode commands _from a GCS_, the...

@DonLakeFlyer - At the present time, there would be no reason for a compliant firmware implementation to NACK a `COMMAND_LONG` if it was also getting `SET_POSITION` messages; both would be...