Ed Kellett

that'd make sense. let's try to send just one notice per /mode though

I'd make it fail if you don't have access rather than send a well-formed realhost reply with non-real hosts

This sends a RPL_LOGGEDIN for `(null)` if I log out. It should probably send RPL_LOGGEDOUT or nothing

I think it'd make more sense as a priv for bots. For people who need to opt in, I think I slightly prefer the idea of an OMSG/ONOTICE type setup.

I think the new commands should probably go in a new module (extensions/omessage?) while the new priv can replace the check for IsOperGeneral with `MayHavePrivilege(x, "oper:bypass_callerid")`

https://github.com/solanum-ircd/solanum/blob/fdd4857c1dba20c8191af9d1660ef8378d181ca0/ircd/s_user.c#L1154 or we could make user mode queries go remote

should this be configurable/can you think of any reason to turn it off?

> * Would there be a good reason to have two different privsets with the same privs but different names? I can't think of anything that doesn't seem super contrived...

#55 hides without disabling. I think it'd be good to have a true disable at some point.

Idle though I'm much less convinced by: could this idea extend to channel bans?