ciftify_statclust_report's csv report is inaccurate when other resolution surfaces file served

[YaoMeng94]

I run the ciftify_statclust_report command with a self-downsampled surface(10k per hemisphere) and the overlap information with the atlases in the csv report looks inaccurate, is this situation about the mismatch between surface option file with the default atlases in ciftify?

[edickie]

Yes, sorry about that, the atlases it's drawing from are in 32k per hemisphere resolution, and there's no internal resampling step.. I'll add extra checks and warnings into the command.

[YaoMeng94]

Thanks answering, would you consider to add a extra option that users can choose the specific atlas to compute the overlap information.

[edickie]

I always intended to add that..(I tried to build the code with the option of adding it) but I don't know if I figured out what that interface would look like for the user. Any suggestions?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:17 PM DearBraveJohn [email protected] wrote:

Thanks answering, would you consider to add a extra option that users can choose the specific atlas to compute the overlap information.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/edickie/ciftify/issues/116?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADEXT5SEZLNBUI2BX6QJQB3P6PRKNA5CNFSM4H24KMLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZOZGFA#issuecomment-509448980, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEXT5UY4E7F3YFBKH34CALP6PRKNANCNFSM4H24KMLA .