eclipse
Ports Combined With Layered Interactive
Describe the bug
I notice that when I user interactive layered layout, for some reason all my outgoing ports are merged... I am not sure why. The interactive node positions seems to work properly, it's just the ports that are combined.
Here is an original layout:
code
{
"id": "--eclipse-layout-kernel-root",
"layoutOptions": {
"elk.algorithm": "layered",
"elk.direction": "DOWN",
"elk.layered.nodePlacement.strategy": "NETWORK_SIMPLEX",
"elk.aspectRatio": 1.1271249076127126
},
"children": [
{
"id": "class-top",
"layoutOptions": {
"elk.algorithm": "layered",
"elk.direction": "DOWN",
"elk.spacing.componentComponent": "5",
"elk.spacing.nodeNode": "5",
"elk.padding": "[top=5,left=5,bottom=5,right=5]",
"elk.spacing.portPort": "0",
"portConstraints": "FREE"
},
"children": [
{
"id": "node-//",
"width": 24,
"height": 24,
"ports": [
{
"id": "port-node-//-0",
"layoutOptions": {
"port.side": "SOUTH",
"port.index": "1"
}
},
{
"id": "port-node-//-1",
"layoutOptions": {
"port.side": "SOUTH",
"port.index": "0"
}
}
],
"labels": [
{
"text": "/"
}
],
"layoutOptions": {
"portConstraints": "FIXED_ORDER"
}
}
],
"ports": [
{
"id": "port-class-incoming-//-0"
},
{
"id": "port-class-incoming-//-1"
},
{
"id": "port-class-outgoing-//-0"
},
{
"id": "port-class-outgoing-//-1"
}
],
"edges": [
{
"id": "edge-inner-//-0",
"edgeID": "//-0",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-node-//-0"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-0"
]
},
{
"id": "edge-inner-//-1",
"edgeID": "//-1",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-node-//-1"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-1"
]
}
]
}
],
"edges": [
{
"id": "edge-outer-//-0",
"edgeID": "//-0",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-0"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-incoming-//-0"
]
},
{
"id": "edge-outer-//-1",
"edgeID": "//-1",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-1"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-incoming-//-1"
]
}
]
}
And here is the interactive version of it, using the positions of the first one to start:
code
{
"id": "--eclipse-layout-kernel-root",
"layoutOptions": {
"elk.algorithm": "layered",
"elk.direction": "DOWN",
"elk.layered.nodePlacement.strategy": "INTERACTIVE",
"elk.aspectRatio": 1.1271249076127126,
"elk.layered.cycleBreaking.strategy": "INTERACTIVE",
"elk.layered.layering.strategy": "INTERACTIVE",
"elk.layered.crossingMinimization.semiInteractive": "true"
},
"children": [
{
"id": "class-top",
"layoutOptions": {
"elk.algorithm": "layered",
"elk.direction": "DOWN",
"elk.spacing.componentComponent": "5",
"elk.spacing.nodeNode": "5",
"elk.padding": "[top=5,left=5,bottom=5,right=5]",
"elk.spacing.portPort": "0",
"portConstraints": "FREE",
"elk.layered.cycleBreaking.strategy": "INTERACTIVE",
"elk.layered.layering.strategy": "INTERACTIVE",
"elk.layered.nodePlacement.strategy": "INTERACTIVE",
"elk.layered.crossingMinimization.semiInteractive": "true"
},
"children": [
{
"id": "node-//",
"width": 24,
"height": 24,
"ports": [
{
"id": "port-node-//-0",
"layoutOptions": {
"port.side": "SOUTH",
"port.index": "1"
},
"x": 8,
"y": 24
},
{
"id": "port-node-//-1",
"layoutOptions": {
"port.side": "SOUTH",
"port.index": "0"
},
"x": 16,
"y": 24
}
],
"labels": [
{
"text": "/"
}
],
"layoutOptions": {
"portConstraints": "FIXED_ORDER"
},
"x": 5,
"y": 5
}
],
"ports": [
{
"id": "port-class-incoming-//-0",
"x": 5,
"y": 0
},
{
"id": "port-class-incoming-//-1",
"x": 10,
"y": 0
},
{
"id": "port-class-outgoing-//-0",
"x": 10,
"y": 98
},
{
"id": "port-class-outgoing-//-1",
"x": 10,
"y": 98
}
],
"edges": [
{
"id": "edge-inner-//-0",
"edgeID": "//-0",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-node-//-0"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-0"
]
},
{
"id": "edge-inner-//-1",
"edgeID": "//-1",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-node-//-1"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-1"
]
}
],
"x": 22,
"y": 22
}
],
"edges": [
{
"id": "edge-outer-//-0",
"edgeID": "//-0",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-0"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-incoming-//-0"
]
},
{
"id": "edge-outer-//-1",
"edgeID": "//-1",
"sourceNode": "node-//",
"targetNode": "class-top",
"sources": [
"port-class-outgoing-//-1"
],
"targets": [
"port-class-incoming-//-1"
]
}
]
}
Expected behavior I would expect the ports to be distinct instead of being combined in the interactive layout.
Screenshots [included above]
ELK Version 0.9.3
Additional context
I have tried it with and without "elk.layered.crossingMinimization.semiInteractive": "true" as well as "elk.layered.crossingMinimization.strategy": "INTERACTIVE" and neither seem to help.
This bug is from https://github.com/egraphs-good/egraph-visualizer
At least one part of the issue is the INTERACTIVE node placement strategy, as seen here.
The slightly different second graph you posted in elkt seems to be fine.
I could not replicate that adding the interactive strategies caused the problem you described in elkt. Maybe the issues come with port sizes of zero and concrete positions for ports?
