node-wot

node-wot copied to clipboard

Setting cookie from Response Header Set-Cookie

3

Me and @egekorkan encountered with a case where we need to send session information to interact with a Thing. Therefore we thought, the token can be sent as a cookie,...

hasanheroglu

Calling HttpServer's stop method in binding-http returns nothing

3

The following problem occurred. I apologize for the inconvenience and would appreciate your confirmation. I would appreciate it if you could tell me if I am calling it the wrong...

hidetak

As discovered by @relu91, there is currently a bug in the CoAP binding implementation that leads to servers returning `undefined` when the initial observe GET request is received. The issue...

JKRhb

Modbus polling rate is taken for the subscription interval whereas it is the maximum polling rate in [the modbus binding](https://w3c.github.io/wot-binding-templates/bindings/protocols/modbus/ontology.html#haspollingtime). Even though this is a false understanding, I do not...

egekorkan

HTTP Longpolling times out after 1 hour

1

Current implementation of HTTP long polling mechanism times out after 1 hour if no data is set after 1 hour. During the weekly call, we draft a few options: -...

relu91

emitPropertyChange merges payloads - race condition?

1

> That would mean that when emitPropertyChange is called both if statements are true: Just to be precise, it is the emitEvent that is the issue. I am only sending...

danielpeintner

chore: add `guard-for-in` eslint rule

3

(Not only) in the context of #1177, I noticed that some of the for loops use the `for ... in` syntax instead of the `for ... of` syntax. Apparently, the...

JKRhb

Design questions around the `exploreDirectory` method

6

Recently, I've been dealing a lot with the `exploreDirectory` method from the Scripting API and its potential implementation. Although we've made some progress both in node-wot and dart_wot regarding the...

JKRhb

Revert PR#1188 once solved in node-coap

1

> Also I'd add a followup issue to revert the change once it is solved in node-coap. That sounds good! _Originally posted by @JKRhb in https://github.com/eclipse-thingweb/node-wot/issues/1188#issuecomment-1849622438_

danielpeintner

PR 1186 follow-ups w.r.t. validation

1

> I think we can merge this PR as is and look at some points raised in the comments later > * @relu91 check implementation in browser > * @danielpeintner...

danielpeintner