GH-3910 Initialize MemValueFactory with common vocabulary

[hmottestad]

GitHub issue resolved: #3910

Briefly describe the changes proposed in this PR:

---

PR Author Checklist (see the contributor guidelines for more details):

• [ ] my pull request is self-contained
• [ ] I've added tests for the changes I made
• [ ] I've applied code formatting (you can use mvn process-resources to format from the command line)
• [ ] I've squashed my commits where necessary
• [ ] every commit message starts with the issue number (GH-xxxx) followed by a meaningful description of the change

[hmottestad]

Before

Benchmark                                 Mode  Cnt    Score   Error  Units
GetStatementsBenchmark.getTypesAndLabels  avgt    5  138.205 ± 3.405  ms/op
GetStatementsBenchmark.groupByLanguage    avgt    5    0.395 ± 0.035  ms/op
GetStatementsBenchmark.groupByType        avgt    5    5.550 ± 1.104  ms/op

Benchmark                      Mode  Cnt   Score   Error  Units
ClassBenchmarkEmpty.shacl      avgt    5  35.333 ± 4.160  ms/op
ClassBenchmarkEmpty.shaclBulk  avgt    5  23.326 ± 2.817  ms/op

After

Benchmark                                 Mode  Cnt    Score   Error  Units
GetStatementsBenchmark.getTypesAndLabels  avgt    5  124.814 ± 0.286  ms/op
GetStatementsBenchmark.groupByLanguage    avgt    5    0.367 ± 0.001  ms/op
GetStatementsBenchmark.groupByType        avgt    5    4.617 ± 0.436  ms/op

Benchmark                      Mode  Cnt   Score   Error  Units
ClassBenchmarkEmpty.shacl      avgt    5  36.835 ± 1.774  ms/op
ClassBenchmarkEmpty.shaclBulk  avgt    5  24.892 ± 1.110  ms/op

[hmottestad]

At the moment I haven't found any existing benchmarks that are improved in this branch. The changes are based on my WIP performance branch #3854. Fixing one bottle neck will often reveal another performance issue that was masked by the initial bottle neck, so that might be the case here too. That being said there are quite a few fixes in that branch that didn't end up making much of a difference.

[hmottestad]

Before

Benchmark                                                              (param)  Mode  Cnt   Score   Error  Units
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer  moreRdfs::12180  avgt    5  11.254 ± 0.163  ms/op
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer  longChain::5803  avgt    5   8.083 ± 0.048  ms/op
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer      medium::544  avgt    5   0.833 ± 0.003  ms/op
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer      simple::152  avgt    5   0.470 ± 0.016  ms/op

After

Benchmark                                                              (param)  Mode  Cnt   Score   Error  Units
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer  moreRdfs::12180  avgt    5  10.517 ± 0.882  ms/op
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer  longChain::5803  avgt    5   7.472 ± 0.511  ms/op
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer      medium::544  avgt    5   0.800 ± 0.085  ms/op
ReasoningBenchmark.forwardChainingSchemaCachingRDFSInferencer      simple::152  avgt    5   0.436 ± 0.033  ms/op

[abrokenjester]

Marking as stale to indicate this has been inactive for a while, and we should consider closing it.