ChEBI
ChEBI copied to clipboard
vitamin c
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid, CHEBI:29073 and ascorbate, CHEBI:38290) are (non-validated) children of cofactor. They are not prsthetic groups but used to reduce oxidized sites in other prsthetic groups (ref: 2057141, last sentence), which means it must go in and out of active sites. Therefore I suggest to either create a head entity (e.g. vitamin c) with children 29073 and 38290 and make it a child of coenzyme, or to shift the two entities directly under coenzyme.
Reported by: grotten_olm
Logged In: YES user_id=2048260 Originator: NO
A heading for vitamin C is also needed from the nutritional point-of-view; it will also include L-dehydroascorbic acid. Thus the hierarchy should be: -water-soluble vitamin (CHEBI:27314) --vitamin C ---L-ascorbic acid (CHEBI:29073) ---L-dehydroascorbic acid (CHEBI:27956)
A question arises over whether L-ascorbate should also be a child of vitamin C. It might be better to rely on the relation: L-ascorbate (CHEBI:38290) is conjugate base of L-ascorbic acid (CHEBI:29073) to reflect this, because the direct children of a vitamin entity should perhaps be restricted to the separate contributors to the vitamin activity. Addition of the vitamin heading could allow the inexact synonym of 'Vitamin C' under L-ascorbic acid to be removed.
Original comment by: unwin305
Logged In: YES user_id=802919 Originator: NO
I have created the following relationships:
vitamin C (CHEBI:21241) is a water-soluble vitamin (CHEBI:27314) L-ascorbic acid (CHEBI:29073) is a coenzyme (CHEBI:23354) L-ascorbic acid (CHEBI:29073) is a vitamin C (CHEBI:21241) L-dehydroascorbic acid (CHEBI:27956) is a coenzyme (CHEBI:23354) L-dehydroascorbic acid (CHEBI:27956) is a vitamin C (CHEBI:21241)
I have removed relationships from CHEBI:29073 and CHEBI:38290 to cofactor.
Kirill
Original comment by: kiri11
What happened to these two axioms? I don't see the subclasses in Chebi... L-dehydroascorbic acid (CHEBI:27956) is a vitamin C (CHEBI:21241) L-ascorbic acid (CHEBI:29073) is a vitamin C (CHEBI:21241) Thanks, Damion
Also there is a problem with putting "Vitamin C" and "B Vitamin" under role, but all the other vitamins are under molecular entity. Any vitamin entity under role I would recommend have the suffix "role". This would mean that you need to rername the above. Then create new Vitamin C and B Vitamin entries as material entities which have subclasses of the particular molecules accepted in their group?
Hi I'm trying to follow this subject with another question.
Why 'vitamin C'
and 'B vitamin'
have 'is a'
relationship to 'water-soluble vitamin'
but vitamins D,K,E and A
have the relationship 'has role'
'fat-soluble vitamin'
.
Also, I can't find L-ascorbic acid (CHEBI:29073) is a vitamin C (CHEBI:21241)
.