Allan Ebdrup

@christian-weiss I think it's a really good idea. I don't have time to do much else than accepting PRs and updating the test results as new versions of the testsuite...

Menu in the readme, super great idea. I guess it's also misleading that the current readme doesn't show you that it's actually testing only draft-4

I have added draft 4 and 6, draft 6 is the default, now... I'm out of touch with the developments in the standard. Would it make sense to make draft2019-09...

@daniela-waranie I have added tests for draft-7: https://github.com/ebdrup/json-schema-benchmark/tree/master/draft7 But I chose to not make it the default as all validators fail a LOT of the tests - I'm not sure...

I dont think there will be any performance problem if you just clone on error. And substacks deepclone module should do the trick > On 3. mar. 2016, at 02.17,...

It’s good that you’re enjoying the free software. I would suggest you investigate exact steps to reproduce. And if you want to be really awsome you can du a pull...

@miqmago Did you ever find a way to accomplish replacing all links? I need this :-) Also @galkahana What an awesome library, thank you so much!

@miqmago I didn't have time to look at this. Instead we had a person manually change all the links in the pdf sources.

That would go against the [rules](https://github.com/ebdrup/json-schema-benchmark/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#do-not-give-any-special-treatment-to-any-validator) for the json-schema-benchmark. > Also, do not tweak any of the settings or options of a validator. Each validator should be run in it's...

json-schema-benchmark runs the [official JSON-schema testsuite for formats](https://github.com/json-schema/JSON-Schema-Test-Suite/blob/develop/tests/draft4/optional/format.json). Granted these are optional, but they are part of the [draft4 spec](http://json-schema.org/latest/json-schema-validation.html#anchor107)