report
report copied to clipboard
easystats
[Task]: Increase project coverage
Describe the feature you'd like
✅ Project coverage is 72.25%. We could eventually bring it to +90% or even 100%.
Implementation ideas
No response
Example usage
Package coveraged increased to 81%, which is good, almost a 10% improvement. However, it seems like the following are still at 0%
R/report.brmsfit.R: 0.00%
R/report.compare.loo.R: 0.00%
R/report.glmmTMB.R: 0.00%
R/report.MixMod.R: 0.00%
See:
> covr::package_coverage()
report Coverage: 81.12%
R/report.brmsfit.R: 0.00%
R/report.compare.loo.R: 0.00%
R/report.glmmTMB.R: 0.00%
R/report.MixMod.R: 0.00%
R/utils_grouped_df.R: 13.56%
R/format_model.R: 46.15%
R/report_table.R: 54.24%
R/report_effectsize.R: 60.34%
R/report_htest_kruskal.R: 69.09%
R/report_priors.R: 70.00%
R/report.data.frame.R: 74.53%
R/report.bayesfactor_models.R: 75.39%
R/report_sample.R: 77.90%
R/report.BFBayesFactor.R: 78.00%
R/report_parameters.R: 78.23%
R/report_htest_wilcox.R: 80.00%
R/report_model.R: 80.00%
R/report_random.R: 80.00%
R/utils_misspelled_variables.R: 81.08%
R/report_performance.R: 83.12%
R/report_htest_friedman.R: 83.33%
R/report_intercept.R: 85.71%
R/report_info.R: 86.57%
R/report_participants.R: 87.21%
R/report.R: 87.50%
R/report.lm.R: 88.34%
R/report.factor.R: 92.31%
R/report.sessionInfo.R: 93.26%
R/report.htest.R: 93.27%
R/report_s.R: 93.33%
R/report.compare_performance.R: 93.75%
R/report.stanreg.R: 93.75%
R/report.character.R: 93.86%
R/format_algorithm.R: 95.00%
R/report_htest_chi2.R: 95.12%
R/report_htest_ttest.R: 95.95%
R/report.numeric.R: 96.09%
R/report_htest_fisher.R: 97.14%
R/cite_easystats.R: 97.37%
R/report.aov.R: 97.59%
R/format_citation.R: 100.00%
R/format_formula.R: 100.00%
R/report.default.R: 100.00%
R/report.estimate_contrasts.R: 100.00%
R/report.lavaan.R: 100.00%
R/report.lme.R: 100.00%
R/report.lme4.R: 100.00%
R/report.test_performance.R: 100.00%
R/report_htest_cor.R: 100.00%
R/report_misc.R: 100.00%
R/report_statistics.R: 100.00%
R/report_text.R: 100.00%
R/utils_combine_tables.R: 100.00%
R/utils_error_message.R: 100.00%
Package coveraged increased from 81% to 86%, a good improvement, with critical coverage gains in the previously affected functions (that had 0% coverage). However, there is still room to increase coverage for functions under 90%.
> covr::package_coverage()
report Coverage: 86.10%
R/utils_grouped_df.R: 13.56%
R/format_model.R: 46.15%
R/report_table.R: 54.24%
R/report_effectsize.R: 68.97%
R/report_htest_kruskal.R: 69.09%
R/report_priors.R: 70.00%
R/report.data.frame.R: 74.53%
R/report.bayesfactor_models.R: 75.39%
R/report_sample.R: 77.90%
R/report.BFBayesFactor.R: 78.00%
R/report_parameters.R: 78.23%
R/report_htest_wilcox.R: 80.00%
R/report_model.R: 80.00%
R/report_random.R: 80.00%
R/report.brmsfit.R: 80.83%
R/utils_misspelled_variables.R: 81.08%
R/report_performance.R: 83.12%
R/report_htest_friedman.R: 83.33%
R/report.compare.loo.R: 83.64%
R/report_intercept.R: 85.71%
R/report_info.R: 86.57%
R/report_participants.R: 87.21%
R/report.R: 87.50%
R/report.lm.R: 90.81%
R/report.factor.R: 92.31%
R/report.sessionInfo.R: 93.26%
R/report.htest.R: 93.27%
R/report_s.R: 93.33%
R/report.compare_performance.R: 93.75%
R/report.character.R: 93.86%
R/format_algorithm.R: 95.00%
R/report.stanreg.R: 95.00%
R/report_htest_chi2.R: 95.12%
R/report_htest_ttest.R: 95.95%
R/report.numeric.R: 96.09%
R/report_htest_fisher.R: 97.14%
R/cite_easystats.R: 97.37%
R/report.aov.R: 97.59%
R/format_citation.R: 100.00%
R/format_formula.R: 100.00%
R/report.default.R: 100.00%
R/report.estimate_contrasts.R: 100.00%
R/report.glmmTMB.R: 100.00%
R/report.lavaan.R: 100.00%
R/report.lme.R: 100.00%
R/report.lme4.R: 100.00%
R/report.MixMod.R: 100.00%
R/report.test_performance.R: 100.00%
R/report_htest_cor.R: 100.00%
R/report_misc.R: 100.00%
R/report_statistics.R: 100.00%
R/report_text.R: 100.00%
R/utils_combine_tables.R: 100.00%
R/utils_error_message.R: 100.00%