Export S3 methods for model_performance generic #452

[jimrothstein]

[IndrajeetPatil]

@jimrothstein Thanks a lot for doing this! I have modified it a bit to also update NAMESPACE.

@strengejacke I had to move the default method to where generic is defined because otherwise it won't be found by other methods that rely on the default method. The other solution would have been to use Collate field in DESCRIPTION, but I am not a fan of that option.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #498 (551580e) into main (ba99475) will increase coverage by 0.31%. The diff coverage is 13.04%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #498      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.06%   36.37%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          83       82       -1     
  Lines        5341     5341              
==========================================
+ Hits         1926     1943      +17     
+ Misses       3415     3398      -17     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
R/model_performance.R	12.90% <13.04%> (+0.40%)	:arrow_up:
R/model_performance.lm.R	73.95% <0.00%> (+1.04%)	:arrow_up:
R/r2.R	37.45% <0.00%> (+5.99%)	:arrow_up:

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[jimrothstein]

@strengejacke yes, I should have checked where the .default method was defined.

[IndrajeetPatil]

@jimrothstein Do you mind also updating the NEWS.md file and mention these changes?

Remember to include the PR number and your GitHub handle in the news item.

[jimrothstein]

@IndrajeetPatil, Yes, will do, but tomorrow ... (was trying to find away to generate all the @export for the methods via embedded code using knitr ... did not work.)

[strengejacke]

@strengejacke I had to move the default method to where generic is defined because otherwise it won't be found by other methods that rely on the default method. The other solution would have been to use Collate field in DESCRIPTION, but I am not a fan of that option.

Sounds good to me!

[IndrajeetPatil]

@jimrothstein Why did you close this?

@strengejacke I think this can be reopened and merged?

[jimrothstein]

@IndrajeetPatil @strengejacke

Hadn't heard from anyone in long time; and was cleaning repos.

Did not realize affect here, which is my fault, but I did not know.

[jimrothstein]

@IndrajeetPatil @strengejacke

Do you want me to continue with tinytest:: checks ?

[strengejacke]

Closing this for now, for two reasons:

1. https://github.com/easystats/parameters/pull/807#issuecomment-1494687759
2. Not sure how to resolve conflicts with the command line.